Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Res ; 279: 208-217, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35780534

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Institutions have reported decreases in operative volume due to COVID-19. Junior residents have fewer opportunities for operative experience and COVID-19 further jeopardizes their operative exposure. This study quantifies the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on resident operative exposure using resident case logs focusing on junior residents and categorizes the response of surgical residency programs to the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted; 276,481 case logs were collected from 407 general surgery residents of 18 participating institutions, spanning 2016-2020. Characteristics of each institution and program changes in response to COVID-19 were collected via surveys. RESULTS: Senior residents performed 117 more cases than junior residents each year (P < 0.001). Prior to the pandemic, senior resident case volume increased each year (38 per year, 95% confidence interval 2.9-74.9) while junior resident case volume remained stagnant (95% confidence interval 13.7-22.0). Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, junior residents reported on average 11% fewer cases when compared to the three prior academic years (P = 0.001). The largest decreases in cases were those with higher resident autonomy (Surgeon Jr, P = 0.03). The greatest impact of COVID-19 on junior resident case volume was in community-based medical centers (246 prepandemic versus 216 during pandemic, P = 0.009) and institutions which reached Stage 3 Program Pandemic Status (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Residents reported a significant decrease in operative volume during the 2019 academic year, disproportionately impacting junior residents. The long-term consequences of COVID-19 on junior surgical trainee competence and ability to reach cases requirements are yet unknown but are unlikely to be negligible.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Competencia Clínica , Estudios de Cohortes , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Cirugía General/educación , Humanos , Pandemias
2.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2019(4): rjz105, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30997011

RESUMEN

Chronic lymphedema (CL) due to failure of lymphatic drainage harbors an immunologically vulnerable environment for the development of various neoplasms. Independently, either melanoma or basal cell carcinoma (BCC) arising from CL has only been reported, but synchronous melanoma and BCC originating from CL is never reported. We report a very rare case of synchronous melanoma and BCC arising from the lymphedematous upper extremity developed secondary to axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Additionally, a literature review reporting either melanoma or BCC in the lymphedematous area was performed using Medline and PubMed databases.

3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 58: 117-120, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31035226

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is considered as one of the most common performed procedures for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Serious complication after colonoscopy could occurs like bleeding or perforation. Majority of the perforations are intraperitoneal, while extraperitoneal perforations are very rare and it may cause pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: A case report was described of 80-year-old female who underwent a diagnostic colonoscopy for recurrent abdominal pain who presented with severe abdominal pain and tenderness with CT findings of pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum and subcutaneous emphysema. The patient successfully treated surgically with laparoscopic Hartman procedure. DISCUSSION: Colonic perforation is rare complication of colonoscopy that can manifest intraperitoneal, extraperitoneal or a combination of both. Patient risk factors include advance age, female sex, diverticulosis, previous abdominal surgery and pre-existing colonic strictures. Technical risk factors includes excessive shearing forces during endoscopic insertion, dilation, biopsy and using electrocautery. Majority of the intraperitoneal perforation warrant a surgical intervention whereas isolated extraperitoneal perforation may be managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: Combined intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal colonic perforation are rare presentations following diagnostic colonoscopy and often difficult to diagnose based on the clinical manifestation only. Understanding the manifestation of extraperitoneal perforation will help to properly identify the condition and preventing morbidity and mortality in these patients.

4.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2019(2): rjy310, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30792838

RESUMEN

Transfemoral catheterization continues to be a safe and popular approach for the evaluation of cardiac and limb ischemia. In spite of the use of vascular closing devices, complications can still arise, and rarely, scrotal hematoma with groin swelling in males, which could cause significant morbidity and possibly mortality in those patients at risk. Understanding the different presentations and different ways of management of scrotal hematoma could potentially prevent significant urological complications and exsanguination. This is a case report of a patient who suffered this rare complication that can be used as a comparison with the other few reported cases.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...